Sarah Noble Intermediate School
25 Sunny Valley Rd
New Milford CT, 06776, Litchfield County
Phone: 860-210-4020
Ranking: (425 out of 765, bottom 44%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 4 to Grade 6
School District: New Milford School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 73 | 74 | 77 | 74 | 75 | 81 | 75 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,053 | 1,031 | 1,035 | 1,024 | 1,086 | 1,095 | 1,119 | |||||||
Grade 4: | 334 | 31.7% | 351 | 34.0% | 361 | 34.9% | 307 | 30.0% | 370 | 34.1% | 355 | 32.4% | 355 | 31.7% |
Grade 5: | 345 | 32.8% | 364 | 35.3% | 310 | 30.0% | 365 | 35.6% | 353 | 32.5% | 352 | 32.1% | 389 | 34.8% |
Grade 6: | 374 | 35.5% | 316 | 30.6% | 364 | 35.2% | 352 | 34.4% | 363 | 33.4% | 388 | 35.4% | 375 | 33.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 567 | 53.8% | 543 | 52.7% | 557 | 53.8% | 528 | 51.6% | 550 | 50.6% | 557 | 50.9% | 546 | 48.8% |
Female: | 486 | 46.2% | 488 | 47.3% | 478 | 46.2% | 496 | 48.4% | 528 | 48.6% | 530 | 48.4% | 569 | 50.8% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 38 | 3.6% | 45 | 4.4% | 42 | 4.1% | 44 | 4.3% | 47 | 4.3% | 49 | 4.5% | 45 | 4.0% |
Hispanic: | 106 | 10.1% | 92 | 8.9% | 83 | 8.0% | 89 | 8.7% | 89 | 8.2% | 81 | 7.4% | 86 | 7.7% |
Black: | 23 | 2.2% | 22 | 2.1% | 20 | 1.9% | 23 | 2.2% | 32 | 2.9% | 28 | 2.6% | 20 | 1.8% |
White: | 861 | 81.8% | 857 | 83.1% | 869 | 84.0% | 847 | 82.7% | 916 | 84.3% | 935 | 85.4% | 966 | 86.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 25 | 2.4% | 14 | 1.4% | 20 | 1.9% | 20 | 2.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 162 | 15.4% | 137 | 13.3% | 125 | 12.1% | 131 | 12.8% | 100 | 9.2% | 81 | 7.4% | 86 | 7.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 68 | 6.5% | 77 | 7.5% | 64 | 6.2% | 59 | 5.8% | 68 | 6.3% | 61 | 5.6% | 53 | 4.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.41 | 14.03 | 13.51 | 13.86 | 14.41 | 14.70 | 14.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.4% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.5% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.3% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.5% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.4% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 81.5% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 81.1% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 75.1% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 73% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 79% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 78.5% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 81.4% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 79% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 78.8% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.5% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 89.9% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.4% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.3% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.9% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.7% | 83.5% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 83.8% | 80.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.4% | 82.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 85.3% | 83.1% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 91.5% | 85.9% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 85.9% | 87.8% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.5% | 84.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 80.7% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 69.2% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 87.9% | 77.7% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 79.8% | 75.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 80.8% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.7% | 79.1% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.6% | 81.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 92.6% | 82.9% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 86.9% | 82.5% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 91.8% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.1% | 81.7% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.3% | 85.3% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.4% | 85.7% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.4% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 90.9% | 86.5% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.6% | 87.3% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 86.9% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 82.2% | 87.7% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.4% | 79.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91% | 82.7% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 88.8% | 84.3% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 91.2% | 86.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94% | 88.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 89.9% | 88.5% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 87.2% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 90.0% | 85.9% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80.8% | 75.4% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.5% | 75.7% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.1% | 77.6% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | 80.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.6% | 85.5% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.6% | 86.5% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 84.8% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 84.5% |
2006 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 82.7% |
2007 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.7% | 83.8% |
2008 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.6% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.1% | 83.1% |
2010 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.3% | 85.5% |
2011 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 86.1% |
2012 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88% | 84.9% |
2013 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.4% | 84.3% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Sarah Noble Intermediate School was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.